Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

El pensamiento teológico de María Zambrano – Cartas de la Piece – Correspondencia con Agustín Andreu Madrid: Editorial Sindéresis, 2018 Juana Sánchez-Gey Venegas

Entre la ciencia del Derecho y el arte de la política <<Melquíades Álvarez, jurisconsulto>> Manuel Álvarez-Buylla Ballesteros   Ediciones de la Universidad de OviedoCol. Estudios (Investigaciones de Ciencias Jurídico Sociales)Oviedo, 2020 288 pp. 29 eurosISBN: 978-84-16343-83-6

Sociología de la identidad estadounidense: qué les ha unido y les divide hoy Antonio Sánchez Bayón Editorial: Sindéresis. Madrid, 2019.ISBN: 978-84-16262-71-7.Depósito legal: M-17511-2019.

Reencontrando a Gaia <<A hombros de James Lovelock y Lynn Margulis>> Carlos de Castro Carranza Ediciones del Genal, Málaga, 2019.269 pp.13,30€Pags: 196

Coudenhove-Kalergi Un ideal para Europa Juan Manuel de FaramiñánFernández-Fígares Editorial Dykinson.Madrid, 2017, 335 pp.

La humanidad aumentada: La administración digital del mundo Éric Sadin Editorial Caja NegraBuenos Aires, 2018, 160 pp.ISBN: 978-987-1622-53-5

Filósofos de paseo<<Pasear detrás de pensar>>Ramón del Castillo Turner, Madrid, 2020.

La imaginación conservadora Gregorio Luri   Páginas: 344Editorial: ArielPVP: 17,90 €ISBN 13: 978-8434429611  

Introduction to Bajo Palabra issue number 23, 2020.

States claim and mutually recognize the right to exclude potential immigrants at their own discretion. From a liberal perspective, the justification for this exclusion is not obvious. Wellman argues that this right is justified on the ground of freedom of association: just as a club can discriminate in its associative terms, so can the State. This article criticizes this argument and argues that the underlying analogy is wrong. On the one hand, States are not like clubs, and clubs are not like states. The first ones follow the logic of the private law, the second ones the logic of the public law. To argue in favor of such an analogy leads to implausible consequences. On the other hand, if freedom of association is the basis of the argument, it does not follow the right of states to exclude potential immigrants, but the right of world citizens to associate across national borders.