Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

How a Court of Law and a State entity by prejudices rushed into ignoring peruvianrules of Private International Law and committed the crime of prevarication.

Prevention and transboundary environmental damage. Both categories are the basis of along and unfinished international debate on the proposal of the Draft Articles for theDetermination of International Responsibility for the Injurious Consequences of Acts NotProhibited by International Law (international liability in case of loss caused by atransboundary harm resulting from hazardous activities), prepared in the InternationalLaw Commission in 2001. However, before and after the approval of the final text of theaforementioned project, States either regionally or globally have made efforts to codingfor the definition, prevention and punishment of this type of damage. The presentinvestigation has as purpose to carry out an examination of said international instrumentsthat from 1963 to 2018 have contributed substantially to the study of this type of damages,and to the delimitation of the formal and material guarantees established in favor of theStates; trying to crystallize also the gaps that normatively this matter faces. The actualityof the issue is even more evident when from our region, Latin America, processes havebeen developed before the International Court of Justice, on the affectation to the territoryand goods for transboundary environmental damages, v. Gr.: Argentina v. Uruguay,(2010), Ecuador v. Colombia, (2013), and the high procedural accumulation case (CostaRica v. Nicaragua and Nicaragua v. Costa Rica (2015).) It can not be ignored that Stateshave the obligation to guarantee that the activities carried out within their jurisdiction orits control does not cause harm to the environment of other States and exhaust all meansto avoid or prevent risks. The results to be obtained with the investigation are: determinewhat normative criteria have reached a standard of general application, and, establish theopportunities of regulations still pending for a better resolution of the processes submittedto competition from international jurisdictions.

Universidad Ricardo Palma, Editorial Universitaria. Lima, 2020.

Editorial National Jury of Elections, 2020, 1st. Ed., Pp. 400.

The fight against impunity for serious human rights violations and the establishment of a permanent international criminal court have been a constant since the Second World War. At the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century, new international criminal jurisdictions were established in addition to a permanent international criminal court, the Special Tribunals to avoid leaving unpunished serious human rights violations of international law, that occurred during the cold war and the Residual Mechanisms as a part of strategy to end all temporary international criminal jurisdiction activity established post Cold War. Both urisdictions, although temporary, recognize the importance of national justice and aim to strengthen the international criminal justice system.

Second edition. EditorialIkono S.A., 2020, pp. 278.

In this article, the focus is the rights of children from the point of view of International Law.First, the historic evolution that happened in the twentieth century until the 1989 UnitedNations Convention. Nonetheless, the essential element that has emerged (the best interestof the Child) first appeared through jurisprudence in the XVIII Century. After studying theConvention, it is necessary to study the problems that formulate the Reserved matters aswell as underline its content, this paper will shift its focus onto the concretion of the superiorinterest of the minor, its relativism, la relevant of being heard and its application in differentmaterial aspects of family life, in which appeared.

A tribute to 10 years of his departure

Pronunciamiento SPDI N° 006-2020

(1927-2020)