Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

This work refers to the link between the current national pension mobility system and the principle of progressivity in the area of ​​social rights. In particular, it tries to critically study the model of Law 27.426, in order to understand whether or not it respects the legal bases of social security law. For this, starting from general concepts such as pension mobility and the value of the principles of law, with special emphasis on progressivity, it is a question of checking the initial hypothesis, analyzing the content and scope of the current national pension mobility with the rule of the non-regression. Various sources are used, such as doctrine, legislation, jurisprudence, and the national constitution with some international treaties, which allow us to arrive at the conclusion that Law 27.426 in force in Argentina since the end of 2017 is in violation of the principle of progressivity.

In this work I will make a brief tour of the epistemological rupturesthat have broken through the ways of thinking about the criminal issue. When speaking of epistemological rupture I mean that, in the way of studying certainphenomena, the object of study or the sources changes, as well as the method of studyis modified, while at the same time it is a transversal issue in this field, the borders that the discipline has in relation to other knowledge, mainly its autonomic character. Analyzed the main consequences of these ruptures, I propose to confront them with the current conditions of criminological thoughts,and explain the epistemological rupture that we experience today. From the latter, I understand that multiple paths are open to generate content (and concrete actions) on that new object of study.  

The new Civil and Commercial Code, as a response to the needs of a modern society, establishes new forms of ownership as autonomous real property rights. The controversy regarding these concepts’ legal nature dates back to old times; and the new Civil and Commercial Code ends this discussion. Therefore, we shall observe, in the first place, the antecedents to these new forms of ownership, what legal theory and precedent have declared as to their nature, in order to analyze how they are then stated in the new law. While their acceptance is admissible, the way in which they have been accepted is not; as I I understand that such way infringes upon the numerus clausus system dominant in the subject, causing a distortion of the general principles of real property rights, object which will be specially studied herein.

This article gives an account of the importance of including the General Theory of Procedural Law as an independent subject in the legal profession. It stands out in the protagonist role that in the teaching of law has the learning of the existing interrelation between the fundamental institutes that integrate this Theory, such as: the jurisdiction; the procedural action, pretension and exception; the process, the general theory of the proof and the means of contestation, etc., among many others; that is, the 'legal tools' that the Law grants to subjects of law for the resolution of conflicts with legal relevance in the framework of the Due Process of Law with a guarantee to the parties to confront on an equal footing, before an impartial third party, that is, a pre-existing state body with jurisdiction and competence that guarantees a peaceful solution to the conflict. It is emphasized in the sense that these institutes and their derivatives, in their application and operation, are common for the treatment of conflicts in any branch of the public or private fund. In short, know-how is taught / learned, with these instruments give due solution to intersubjective legal conflicts.  

Like the being or not being of Hamlet's monologue, for education, the problems generated by evaluation and qualification constitute some of the existential themes. The institutional need to certify formative processes does not allow us to dispense with it, condemning us to the pain of looking for - in a transcendent way in our teaching life - answers to a myriad of questions about formats and ways. Trying to understand the generational tension in the classroom, the problematic about the incorporation of technological tools, the need to add more practice, the subjectivity of the actors of the teaching-learning process and the hidden curriculum are passages of the present work that has the intention of invite the reader to reflect if, undesired with our usual examining practices, we are evaluating performance or devaluing people.

Il presente lavoro, configura una versione estratta di un altro importante che ha l'oggetto della formulazione di una tesi scientifica su "Il licenziamento senza causa come atto discriminatorio", suscitato nell'ambito del Master in Diritto sociale della Facoltà di Scienze giuridiche e sociali del UNLP. Con questo chiarimento, cominciano queste linee, in cui cercherà di lasciare sistemate le basi e i punti di partenza per la costruzione di una teoria generale dei diritti umani, dalla ri-significazione di concetti come la dignità e la discriminazione, che servono come pietra angolare della futura struttura regolatoria. Tutto ciò, al fine di raggiungere un livello di efficacia maggiore di quello attuale, nella tutela legale dei diritti umani in generale e dei diritti umani specifici sul lavoro, come il diritto "al lavoro" e "la stabilità in esso".

The analysis of neoliberal doctrine has many studies on the subject of macroeconomic reforms and its hypothesis on the Keynesian model of planning, whose most relevant work was François Bilger. Another study of neoliberal doctrine focused on the topic of governance technologies and governmentality, in the same sense as Michel Foucault. But there are other issues that are mentioned in this article that are relevant to judicial theory: it is the concept of the Rule of law or Reichtstaatt that has been formulated by Haek and Böhm. These formulations raised a point of rupture against the classic concept of the rule of law, which begins with the Weimar period and ends in the period after Germany.

From the protective paradigm of the Constitution and humanitarian law, developed in the Civil and Commercial Code, the typical rights of people in vulnerable situations are analyzed. It is postulated a protective justice, “of accompaniment”, articulating the bases for its regulation in the procedural regulations.

The present article wonders about the difficulty to indict young people in the Argentine Republic. It puts these hardships in context and enounces some obstacles that weaken the quality of the debate, the way it’s introduced, the arguments used and finally how all these make complex to reach sustainable agreements.

The aim is approach the history of law to the readers of the magazine and guide them in the analysis and critique of the abundant material that contains related to the discipline. It includes a classification of published articles.