Aviso:
Los resultados se limitan exclusivamente a documentos publicados en revistas incluidas en el Catálogo 2.0 de Latindex.
Para más información sobre el Descubridor de Artículos escribir al correo: descubridorlatindex@gmail.com.
Leer más
Búsqueda por:
546,196 artículos
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Ius Canonicum
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Jose María Vázquez-García-Peñuela
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Ángel López-Sidro López
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Alberto de la Hera
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
José Ignacio Rubio-López
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
In its last term 2005-2006, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) decided its first case regarding religious freedom under the Roberts Court on February 21, 2006. The USSC (Gonzales v. o Centro Espirita) applied again the doctrine of the strict scrutiny (Sherbert-Yoder), and affirmed the federal application of the RFRA '93. This controversy did not enter in the USSC's contradictions on the free exercise of religion. Thus, we have to wait a new USSC's decision that affirms the strict scrutiny (Sherbert) or the neutrality standard (Smith), overrulling one or another precedent and defining the doctrine of «free exercise exemptions». But, the «free exercise exemptions», are a legal or a constitutional matter? That’s the question.
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Jose María Vázquez-García-Peñuela
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Dominique Le-Tourneau
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Jorge Miras
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
The object of the contentious-administrative recourse are the singular administrative acts issued or approved by the dicasteries of the Roman Curia, whenever it is contended that the impugned act violated some law either in the decision or in the procedure used (cfr. const. Pastor Bonus, art. 123). On the correct interpretation of this norm, it depends that the recourse may observe actually the comprehensive function of guarantee for which it was established. The author analyses, firstly, the canonical concept of administrative act, to conclude that no singular juridical act of the executive power must be excluded from the recourse for motives purely formal. Secondly, he studies the contestability of the administrative acts of the roman dicasteries and, in particular, some problems which the discipline of the administrative silence poses in these confines. Finally, he discusses about the sense of the violation of law as a motive of the recourse and, in connection with this theme, he refers to the limits of the competence of the Apostolic Signatura in resolving these recourses.
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
María José Roca
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|
Año:
2017
ISSN:
2254-6219, 0021-325X
Ius Canonicum
Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
Resumen
|