Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

In Portuguese literature, the term “infocommunication” is conceptualized as a process, a mediation tool, and a social behavior that directly influences the individual’s conduct in the current information and communication environment. This includes the understanding, processing, and sharing of received information. The concept describes how technology impacts communication and how new technologies and multimedia services are transforming the way people use and communicate information. Since the mid-2010s, terms such as “infocommunicational beings” and “infocommunicational behavior” have emerged. This article aims to synthesize the particularities of the “infocommunication” concept and the associated terms present in Portuguese-language works. We conducted an integrative literature review, collecting documents that refer to this term and describing the presented conceptualizations. The results show a list of 22 terms related to infocommunication, their descriptions, relationships, and meanings. Understanding these terms enriches the dialogue among researchers by broadening the comprehension of these concepts and the discussion about their scope.

The article analyzes media responses to disinformation during the recent presidential elections in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico between 2018 and 2023. The study concentrates on the propagated disinformation narratives and the strategies that diverse social actors developed to counteract them. Through an exploratory and documentary analysis, we encountered that disinformation narratives focused mainly on discrediting candidates and raising doubts about the legitimacy of electoral processes. Among the several implemented responses to counter this, data verification was the most common strategy. Moreover, verification platforms, communication media, civil society organizations, governments and electoral institutions collaborated to identify and deny false information. The research underscores the importance of ongoing investigation and the development of tailored counter-disinformation strategies for each country, emphasizing the need to enhance citizens’ information literacy skills in the face of evolving technologies like artificial intelligence.

This article, derived from the research “Towards a reconfiguration of the records appraisal process in Colombia, based on theoretical currents and archival regulations (1960-2020)”, analyzes the influences of the archival theoretical approaches theory of value, documentation plan, and macro-appraisal in the guidelines and appraisal methodology in the country since the General Archive of the Nation creation in 1989 until the last regulation issued in 2019. The methodology used was documentary research, which included the review of authors related to these three theoretical approaches in addition to the Colombian archival regulations related to appraisal. We conclude that Colombian regulations have been mainly influenced by the theory of value; although they also incorporate elements of the other two approaches in documentary heritage configuration.

This paper analyzes how artificial intelligence can assist in selecting audiovisual documents in television networks to streamline the documentation process. The objective is to demonstrate how, where, and with which applications artificial intelligence can intervene to optimize the audiovisual selection process, particularly in news programs. To achieve this, we conducted a literature review and a state-of-the-art analysis of Spanish audiovisual companies, inferring how artificial intelligence could aid in automating the selection process and identifying current tools that could enhance this process. The results show that although better algorithms still need to be developed, there are potentialities within artificial intelligence technology to automate the process.

The development of information literacy, referring to access, evaluation and use of information, has a significant role in teacher training. In this respect, we share a study whose objective was to analyze aspects of the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of information literacy research in teacher training, a challenge undertaken from a 2013-2023 systematic review of 24 Scopus and Web of Science articles. The results reveal the prevalence of the quantitative approach. Also, research objectives were framed into four study axes: evaluation, training, the relationship with other competencies, and other actors.

This text addresses an issue in the cataloging of fine arts collections in Mexico, particularly those that belong to the federal government or that are under guardianship of the State, and bear or might be assigned the category of ‘artworks’. Documents by the Superior Audit of the Federation (Auditoría Superior de la Federación) have consistently pointed out that the cataloging of such objects lags behind schedule. Such delay can be explained, at least partially, by the use of legal criteria, in which polysemy, theoretical definitions, management needs or cultural customs create unsolved ambiguity in stating object ‘types’. Since ‘type’ entails a crucial disjunction in the cultural heritage sphere, its lack of precision ends up begetting incoherence in modern digital systems. The conclusion of this paper discusses the convenience of making Type a repeating field and the possibility of including some metadata to properly define ‘types’, while warning about the consequences and difficulties of building a system too complex.

The work conveys the event that occurred at the beginning of the tenth century in the Abbey of Saint Gall: the mystic, saint and martyr Wiborada [ca. 861 A. D. - 926 A. D.] experienced the vision of the arrival of Magyars to the monastery, which helped to save and protect the manuscripts in her library. Thereupon, the destruction of the Library of the Abbey of Saint Gall can be conceived as a corpus sic, anima non. The study begins by addressing medieval monastic libraries, followed by the Regulae, around which monasticism is based, and concludes with the martyr figure. To achieve this, the study alludes to the Casus sancti Galli by Ekkehard IV and the Vitae Sanctae Wiboradae by Walter Berschin. The work constitutes a tribute to the life and work of Wiborada.

Recently, new phenomena have appeared in the flow of information, such as post-truth and misinformation, as well as the physical isolation of people and documents. This has led to an increased demand for and satisfaction with remote services. The above raises the question of whether the model proposed as the gnoseological foundation for documentary information science, the documentary information system, continues to fulfill its function. The thesis defended here is that there is no paradigm shift, rather, the model remains valid, although certain concepts, such as metasystem, documentary, information, and the information professional, require clarification.

Adriana Mata Puente, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Adriana Suárez Sánchez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Albano Torres Gómez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Alberto Castro Thompson, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Alberto Ramos Alonso, Investigador independiente, (España)Alejandra Martínez Del Prado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Alejandro Arnulfo Ruiz León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Ana Clara Cândido, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina, (Brasil)Ana Georgina Alba Betancourt, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Ana Lúcia Silva Terra, Universidad de Coimbra, (Portugal)Ángel Bravo Vinaja, Colegio de Postgraduados, (México)Angel Freddy Godoy Viera, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina, (Brasil)Antonio Carpallo Bautista, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Antonio García Jiménez, Universidad de Salamanca, (España)Antonio Sánchez Pereira, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Ariadne Chloe Furnival, Universidad Federal de San Carlos, (Brasil)Ariel Alejandro Rodríguez García, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Aurora Josefina de la Vega Ramírez, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, (Perú)Berenice Mears Delgado, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, (México)Brenda Cabral Vargas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Carlos Adolfo Piña García, Universidad Veracruzana, (México)Carlos Alberto Suárez Balseiro, Universidad de Puerto Rico, (Puerto Rico)Carlos Miguel Tejada Artigas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Catalina Naumis Peña, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Celia Mireles Cárdenas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Claudia Laudano, Universidad de Buenos Aires, (Argentina)Concepción Mendo Carmona, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Críspulo Travieso Rodríguez, Universidad de Salamanca, (España)Cristóbal Urbano Salido, Universidad de Barcelona, (España)Daniar Chávez Jiménez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Daniela Alejandra de Filippo, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, (España)Diana Lucio Arias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, (Colombia)Douglas Farias Cordeiro, Universidad Federal de Goiás, (Brasil)Eder Ávila Barrientos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Eduardo Oliva Cruz, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Eduardo Robles Belmont, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Eliana Maria dos Santos Bahia Jacintho, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina, (Brasil)Elisabete Gonçalves de Souza, Universidad Federal Fluminense, (Brasil)Elizabeth Huisa Veria, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, (Perú)Elsa Margarita Ramírez Leyva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Emilce Sena Correa, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, (Paraguay)Esther Elena García Carpintero, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, (España)Eugenia de los Ángeles Ortega Martínez, Universidad de Minnesota, (Estados Unidos)Evelia Luna Morales, Instituto Politécnico Nacional , (Cinvestav), (México)Exequiel Aarón Fontans Álvarez, Universidad de la República, (Uruguay)Fernando César Lima Leite, Universidad de Brasilia, (Brasil)Filiberto Felipe Martínez Arellano, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Gerardo Zavala Sánchez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Gisel Cosío Colina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Gladys Ceretta, Universidad de la República, (Uruguay)Guillermo Chávez Sánchez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Hadtyr Axheli García Ortega, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Héctor Alejandro Ramos Chávez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Héctor Edgar Buenrostro Mercado, Centro de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación, (México)Hugo Alberto Figueroa Alcántara, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Hugo Alberto Guadarrama Sánchez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Ibis Anette Lozano Díaz, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Irene Catalina Fenoglio Limón, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, (México)Isaac Becerra Ramírez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Isabel Chong de la Cruz, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Isabel Galina Russell Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Isabel Villaseñor Rodríguez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Isnardo Reducindo Ruiz, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Jairo Nabor Buitrago Ciro, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , (México)Januário Albino Nhacuongue, Universidad Federal de San Carlos, (Brasil)Javier Ruiz Astiz, Universidad de La Coruña, (España)Javier Tarango, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, (México)Jenny Teresita Guerra González, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Jessica Carvajal Lobos Consejera Nacional Colegio de Bibliotecarios de Chile, (Chile) Jesús Francisco García Pérez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Jonathan Hernández Pérez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)José de Jesús Cortés Vera, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, (México)José Jorge Fager Pérez, Universidad de la República, (Uruguay)Juan Antonio Martínez Comeche, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Juan Carlos Barrón Pastor, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Juan Escobedo Romero, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Juan José Calva González, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , (México)Juan José Prieto Gutiérrez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Juan Miguel Castillo Fonseca, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Juan Miguel Palma Peña, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Juan Voutssas Márquez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Julio César Rivera Aguilera, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Lourdes Feria Basurto, Investigadora independiente, (México)Luis Fernando Ramos Simón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Luis Roberto Rivera Aguilera,Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Ma. Maricela Piña Pozas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, (México)Magela Cabrera Castiglioni, Universidad de la República, (Uruguay)Marcela Gil Calderón, Universidad de Costa Rica, (Costa Rica)Marco Brandão, Universidad Federal Fluminense, (Brasil)Maria Angélica Fuentes Martínez, Biblioteca Nacional de Chile, (Chile)María Antonia Ovalle Perandones, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)María Gabriela Arévalo Guízar, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)María Graciela Martha Tecuatl Quechol, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, (ENBA), (México)María Luisa Lascurain Sánchez, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, (España)María Raquel Evangelio Llorca, Universidad de Alicante, (España)Mariana Buendía Oliva, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Mario Guido Barité, Universidad de la República, (Uruguay)Marta Pilar Bianchi, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, (Argentina)Martha Delia Castro Montoya, Universidad Veracruzana, (México)Martha Elena Romero Ramírez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Martín Alonso Estrada Cuzcano, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, (Perú)Mauricio Trapaga Delfín, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Mercedes Caridad Sebastián, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, (España)Michela Montesi, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Michely Jabala Mamede Vogel, Universidad Federal Fluminense, (Brasil)Miguel Ángel Germán Mejía Argueta, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Miguel Ángel Marzal García-Quismondo, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, (España)Miguel Ángel Pérez Angón, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, (Cinvestav), (México)Miguel Gama Ramírez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Moisés Lima Dutra, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina, (Brasil)Nancy Jacqueline García Reyna, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Nancy Sánchez Tarragó, Universidad Federal de Río Grande del Norte, (Brasil)Natalia Aguirre Ligüera, Universidad de la República, (Uruguay)Norma Raquel Gauna González, El Colegio de San Luis, A. C., (México)Patricia Hernández Salazar, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , (México)Patricia Ramos Fandiño, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Rafael Repiso, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, (España)Ricardo Alonso Tejedor Estupiñán, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, (Colombia)Ricardo Montes Gómez, Senado de la República, (México)Roberto Sánchez Ahedo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , (México)Rodrigo Antonio Vega y Ortega, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , (México)Rodrigo Sánchez Jiménez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, (España)Rogério Henrique de Araújo Júnior, Universidad de Brasilia, (Brasil)Rolando Reategui Lozano, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, (Perú)Rosa Amelia Domínguez Arteaga, El Colegio de Tamaulipas, (México)Rosa Elba Chacón Escobar, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, (México)Rosa María Fernández Esquivel, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México , (México)Rosa María Martínez Rider, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Rosângela Schwarz Rodrigues, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina, (Brasil)Salvador Gorbea Portal, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Sandra Miguel, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, (Argentina)Shirley Elizabeth Ainsworth, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, (México)Silvana Elisa Cruz Domínguez, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, (México)Snejanka Penkova, Universidad de Puerto Rico, (Puerto Rico)Vânia Mara Alves Lima, Universidad de São Paulo, (Brasil)Víctor Federico Herrero Solana, Universidad de Granada, (España)Xochitl Flores Vargas, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, (México)Yolanda Guzmán Guzmán, Universidad de Guanajuato, (México)Yolanda Martín González, Universidad de Salamanca, (España)Yoscelina Iraida Hernández García, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, (México)Zaira Regina Zafalon, Universidad Federal de San Carlos, (Brasil)

Generative artificial intelligence is impacting scholarly communication processes and transforming the conventional methods by which research is conducted, evaluated, and disseminated. However, there remains a lack of clarity regarding how generative artificial intelligence is being integrated into scholarly communication and who the key stakeholders are in its integration and responsible use. In response, this study aims to explore, through a scoping review, how generative artificial intelligence tools are being incorporated into scholarly communication and publishing processes, the challenges associated with their integration, and the key stakeholders involved. A scoping review was conducted to identify the most relevant information on the integration and use of generative artificial intelligence in scholarly communication in specialized databases; it included a total of 90 studies that responded to the research questions. Findings indicated that generative artificial intelligence is being utilized to translate, write, and edit academic articles; in addition to expediting peer review processes. Ethical concerns related to algorithmic bias, plagiarism, and difficulties recognizing artificial intelligence-generated content and the lack of globally accepted policies regarding its use were also evidenced. Similarly, several key stakeholders in the integration and use of generative artificial intelligence were identified, including researchers, editors, peer reviewers, and academic libraries, among others.