Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

The main objective of the research is to analyze the level of user satisfaction, as well as to identify the influencing factors in the Manuel Bartlett Bautista central library located at the Juárez Autónoma University in the Centro municipality, Tabasco. The research is of a quantitative type with a descriptive scope and a non-experimental design, the variables are analyzed independently, the unit of analysis was the Academic Division of Administrative Economic Sciences (DACEA), with a total population of 3,956 active students, of which 458 participated in the satisfaction study, five dimensions of service quality. The factors that significantly influenced the results are: the female gender, who showed greater satisfaction in the dimensions of tangibility, response time and security; the economics and marketing degrees also marked differences between the security dimension, one more factor that influenced was internet connectivity in the empathy dimension, adding that users with a job show less satisfaction. It was concluded that the users are satisfied, having to improve in the aspects of significance for the wellbeing and increase of the users in the library.

The Rhizome Theory proposed by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari is analyzed to identify conceptual elements that allow to base a methodology for classifying documents produced in open and plural environments such as social movements. It is emphasized that the production of documents leads to the production of social relations. This social dimension is analyzed with the help of Walter Benjamin’s concept “functional transformation” (Umfunktionierung) and Susan Star and James Griesemer’s concept “Boundary Object”. The characteristics that the document acquires in the process of literary production proposed by Benjamin and the creation of collaborative environments by Star and Griesemer are compared with the document proposed by Miguel Ángel Rendón Rojas within Documentary Information Science. Finally, metadata and hypertext are identified as the elements that meet the requirements to establish a classification methodology for documents produced in open and changing environments following rhizomatic principles.

In the second half of the 19th century, Colombian bookstores played a significant role in the book market, first dedicated to sales activities and later as publishing agents. This text recounts the work of the Colombian Bookstore as a publishing agent, between 1886 and 1900, in Bogotá. Specifically, it focuses on the edited titles, their different editions and the editorial work, the latter seen through the paratexts. A second part is dedicated to the authors, the themes they worked on and their links to political parties. In this way, we try to understand how the practices, the contents and the agents impacted the political and economic context, but also how they were impacted by it.

The objective of this article is to identify some of the biblioclastic manifestations that occurred in Mexico during the twentieth century, starting from a consideration of biblioclastics as any practice that represents an affectation both to the book and to any documentary property. The methodology used was the bibliographichemerographic research, having as main results that in Mexico during the period of study there was a series of biblioclastic practices of various kinds, such as physical destruction, theft, mutilation, forgetfulness and devaluation, which together represented an affectation not only to the book and documents, but to the ecosystem that surrounds them. In this sense, it was possible to determine that the main type of biblioclastia occurred in Mexico during the twentieth century was biblioclastia due to negligence, as well as the consideration of biblioclastia beyond the mere physical destruction of the book for political, ideological and religious reasons.

The main purpose of this paper is to present the concept of information as a complex object, that is, as a multivariable object of study from the perspective of complexity. This approach breaks the unique vision in the conceptual modeling of the term, overcoming the univocity in the meaning of the information; it is about embracing the issue as a slice of reality from social science. Thinking about information with a renewed meaning, interwoven with different systems, reveals its complex structure, through its different manifestations, as a proposal for the discovery of new research routes from library science and information studies.

Adriana Mata Puente, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (México) Adriana Suárez Sánchez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Agustín Vivas Moreno , Universidad de Extremadura (España) Alejandro Arnulfo Ruiz León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Alessandra Monteiro Pattuzzo Caetano, Centro Universitario FAESA (Brasil) Alicia Parras Parras, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Alma Beatriz Rivera Aguilera, Universidad Iberoamericana (México) Álvaro Quijano Solís, El Colegio de México, A.C. (México) Ana Belén Ríos Hilario , Universidad de Salamanca (España) Ana Carolina Simionato Arakaki , Universidad Federal de San Carlos (Brasil) Ana Célia Rodrigues, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) Ana Lúcia Silva Terra, Universidad de Coimbra (Portugal) Ana Luisa Guerrero Guerrero , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Andrés Fernández Ramos, Universidad de León (España) Ángel Bravo Vinaja , Colegio de Postgraduados (México) Angel Freddy Godoy Viera , Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (Brasil) Antonia Olivia Jarvio Fernández, Universidad Veracruzana (México) Antonia Santos Rosas , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Antonio Carpallo Bautista , Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Antonio González Molina , Universidad de Córdoba (España) Ariadne Chloe Furnival , Universidad Federal de San Carlos (Brasil) Ariel Alejandro Rodríguez García, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Ariel Gutierrez Valencia, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco (México) Brenda Cabral Vargas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Camila Monteiro de Barros, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (Brasil) Carina Rey Martin, Universidad de Barcelona (España) Carlos Adolfo Piña García, Universidad Veracruzana (México) Carlos Alberto Suárez Balseiro, Universidad de Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico) Carlos Christian Compton García Fuentes , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Carlos Miguel Tejada Artigas , Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Carlos Roberto Massao Hayashi, Universidad Federal de San Carlos (Brasil) Catalina Naumis Peña , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Celia Mireles Cárdenas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (México) Cesar H. Limaymanta, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Perú) Cezar Karpinski, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (Brasil) Clarissa Moreira dos Santos Schmidt, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) Concepción Mendo Carmona , Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Críspulo Travieso Rodríguez, Universidad de Salamanca (España) Cristina Fuentes Lara, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (España) Cristóbal Urbano Salido, Universidad de Barcelona (España) Diana Lucio Arias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia) Edgar Bisset, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (Brasil) Elio Atenógenes Villaseñor García, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (México) Elizabeth Huisa Veria , Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Perú) Elke Köppen Prubmann , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Elvira Julieta Miguelez Gonzalez, Universidad de Salamanca (España) Emilce Sena Correa , Universidad Nacional de Asunción (Paraguay) Emir José Suaiden, Universidad de Brasilia (Brasil) Esther Elena García Carpintero, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España) Fabiano Ferreira de Castro, Universidad Federal de San Carlos (Brasil) Federico Del Giorgio Solfa , Universidad Nacional de La Plata (Argentina) Filiberto Felipe Martínez Arellanoz , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Flor de María Silvestre Estela, Universidad de Brasilia (Brasil) Francisco José García Peñalvo, Universidad de Salamanca (España)) Gerardo Ruiz López , Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (México) Graciela Martínez Gutiérrez, Universidad del Centro de México (México) Hadtyr Axheli García Ortega , Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (México) Héctor Alejandro Ramos Chávez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Héctor Edgar Buenrostro Mercado, Centro de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología de la Información y comunicación (México) Héctor Guillermo Alfaro López, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Hugo Alberto Figueroa Alcántara , Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Isabel Galina Russell, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Isabel Villaseñor Rodríguez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Iuliana Botezan, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Jaime Ríos Ortega, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Javier Fernández Molina, Universidad de Alicante (España) Javier Tarango , Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua (México) Jenny Teresita Guerra González, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (éxico) Jesús Francisco García Pérez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Jesús Robledano Arillo, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (España) José Antonio Cordón García, Universidad de Salamanca (España) José Antonio Merlo Vega, Universidad de Salamanca (España) † José López Yepes, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Juan Antonio Martínez Comeche, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Juan José Calva González, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Juan Miguel Castillo Fonseca, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (México) Juan Miguel Palma Peña, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Juan Voutssas Márquez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Laura Cristina Torres Martínez, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (ENBA) (México) Lina Escalona Ríos, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Linair Maria Campos, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) Luis Fernando Ramos Simón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Luis Joyanes Aguilar, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca (España) Luis Manuel Plaza Gómez, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España) Luis Manuel Vilches Blázquez, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CIC) (México) Luis Manuel Plaza Gómez, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España) Luzia Sigoli Fernandes Costa, Universidad Federal de San Carlos (Brasil) Manuel Blázquez Ochando, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Marco Brandão, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) María Antonia Ovalle Perandones, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Maria Cristina P. Innocentini Hayashi, Universidad Federal de San Carlos (Brasil) María Elena Luna-Morales, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV) (México) María Felicidad Tabuenca Cuevas, Universidad de Alicante (España) María Graciela Martha Tecuatl Quechol, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (ENBA) (México) María Guadalupe Vega Díaz, El Colegio de México, A.C. (México) María Idalia García Aguilar, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) María Mercedes Curto Polo, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (España) María Muñoz Rico, Universidad de Salamanca (España) Maria Nelida Gonzalez de Gomez, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) María Olivera Zaldúa, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) María Raquel Evangelio Llorca, Universidad de Alicante (España) María Teresa Múnera Torres, Universidad de Antioquia (Colombia) Marina Garone Gravier, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Mario Guido Barité, Universidad de la República de Uruguay (Uruguay) Martha Adriana Sabelli García, Universidad de la República de Uruguay (Uruguay) Martha Ibáñez Marmolejo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Michela Montesi, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Michely Jabala Mamede Vogel, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) Miguel Ángel Gonzalo Rozas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Miguel Ángel Marzal García-Quismondo, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (España) Miguel Ángel Pérez Angón, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV) (México) Miguel Ángel Rendón Rojas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Miguel Gama Ramírez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Natália Bolfarini Tognoli, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) Nicolás Ávila Seoane, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Nidia Rojas Morales, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (Costa Rica) Norma Raquel Gauna González, El Colegio de San Luis, A.C. (México) Núria Bautista Puig, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (España) Orlando Gregorio Chaviano, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Colombia) Patricia Hernández Salazar, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Paula Regina Dal’Evedove, Universidad Federal de San Carlos (Brasil) Pedro Rueda Ramírez, Universidad de Bracelona (España) Rafael Repiso, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (España) Raquel Gómez Díaz, Universidad de Salamanca (España) Renato Tarciso Barbosa de Sousa, Universidad de Brasilia (Brasil) Ricardo Curto Rodríguez, Universidad de Oviedo (España) Ricardo Montes Gómez, Cámara de Senadores (México) Rodrigo Antonio Vega y Ortega, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Rodrigo Sánchez Jiménez, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) Rogério Henrique de Araújo Júnior, Universidad de Brasilia (Brasil) Rosa Amelia Domínguez Arteaga, El Colegio de Tamaulipas (México) Rosa Elba Chacón Escobar, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas (México) Rosa María Fernández Esquivel, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Rosa María Martínez Rider, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí (México) Rosângela Schwarz Rodrigues, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (Brasil) Thiago Magela Rodrigues Dias, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (Brasil) Ticiana Agustina Alvarado Wall, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (Argentina) Vitor Manoel Marques da Fonseca, Universidad Federal Fluminense (Brasil) Yaminel Bernal Astorga, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México) Yolanda Martín González, Universidad de Salamanca (España)

This study sought to deepen the conception of hybrid libraries as equipment that reflects the use of analog and digital tools, considering the cultural sphere as an integral and participatory factor in the development processes within society. The research is qualitative, descriptive and bibliographic. The Discourse Analysis method was applied to some of the hybrid library concepts raised in the literature during the bibliographic research. Within the institutional space in which the discourse bases its statements, the hybrid library concept is understood as the convergence of technology in the infrastructure of libraries. The right to speak of hybrid libraries began with information professionals and expanded to the communities that such institutions encompass. The discourses on hybrid libraries are intended to delimit the importance of the information professionals who create and maintain library services to the use of technologies, emphasizing training needs for librarians. It is concluded that hybridity must be understood as a model of internal and external library management, therefore, it can and must be applied to all types of libraries, so that these institutions can follow the structural advances of society and remain relevant to their communities.

The custom of collecting objects goes back to the most ancient times of humanity. However, the origin of Western museums can often be seen in the studiolo of the humanist libraries of 15th century Italy. Later, these studiolo would become the “cabinets of curiosities” that arrived in our America, being some of them, within our viceroyalty libraries. Similar to the European cabinets, but not the same, the New Spanish cabinets had their regional singularities as Mexican antiquities were exhibited inside them instead of the Greco-Roman ones that were used to collect in the Old World.

The development of joint projects involving libraries, archives and museums –the LAM institutions– is appearing more frequently in the literature. This text summarizes the common elements and differences between the three corresponding disciplines as well as with Information Science, and intends to establish, from a theoretical-practical basis, how far collaboration or convergence of the concerned institutions in cross-cutting information services projects can be developed, including some methodological elements for the design and construction of such projects.

Since 1990, in the academy it refers to a shift in the way of studying and understanding the rural space, which consists of the blurring of the agrarian debate and the broadening of the gaze towards ruralities. Within this conceptual restructuring, theoretical reflections and applications on outsourcing, service provision, rural tourism and the production of statistical data on these issues become relevant. In this sense, the proposal of this work consists of analyzing from the spatial point of view the variation of tourism and recreation in the rural space of ​​Argentina, using as a source of information the National Agricultural Censuses 2002 and 2018, surveyed by the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses. The census results are compared and interpreted from the sub-provincial level (departments and districts) and from the different variables that refer to tourism and recreation offered from agricultural exploitations, or statistical units of these particular censuses. The approach to this subject not only results from the analysis of the aforementioned sources, but also from the review of specialized literature and, at the operational level, the use of the Geographic Information System for the elaboration of thematic cartography. As a fundamental result, it is established that, although the general growth of tourist and recreational activity in rural apaces of Argentina is a fact indicated by official statistical evidence, the decrease in certain sectors of the national map is also.