Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

 This article is based on our recent research, in which we have analyzed how the normative vacuum in the regulation of the related parent affects the best interest of the child, since in Peru there are no express norms in this regard, thus violating various rights of children and adolescents. Although we have found some norms in which, isolated and tacitly, there is some kind of mention, this is not enough to guarantee the fulfillment of the best interest of the child.

 The persistence of subordinated and unequal gender relations affects women preventing them from fully enjoying their substantive right to equality. The gender- neutral language of laws can exacerbate challenges women face for their rights to be acknowledged. For that reason, gender mainstreaming constitutes an effective tool which enables adjudicators to better assess the facts and evidence of a gender-related case and thus construe laws in such a way as to adjust the structural imbalance between men and women. In recent years, courts have resorted more frequently to this tool to adjudicate cases. . However, it is still in an early face as regards the division of marital assets. For that purpose, this papers reviews, as an example, some Argentine judgments in which this approach helped restore the property rights of women.

 Peruvian case law has shown the legal loopholes in family procedure rules applicable to cases in which people use assisted reproduction techniques. A good example could be the legal consequences of taking legal action when a man refuses to acknowledge a child born out of wedlock who has been conceived by assisted reproduction without his consent and with the intervention of an anonymous sperm donor. In this regard, the active individual of the material relationship will face a dilemma where the State, through the judicial bodies, appears as the best suited to cover the high transaction costs resulting from the legal loopholes with regard to anonymous sperm donors. However, instead of finding a solution, people face unfair decisions triggering new situations that cause high transaction costs.

 Disabled people in Peru directly participate in contractual consumption relationships to satisfy their desires and needs based on a recognition of their full legal capacity. In this regard, law seeks to ensure their autonomy and access; nevertheless, discrimination appears as an obstacle. This study explores the role of support, reasonable adjustments, and administrative justice in the field of contractual consumption relationships of disabled people. The methodology includes addressing doctrine, legal regulations, and case law on the matter. The conclusion is that support and reasonable adjustments play a fundamental role, along with administrative justice by INDECOPI, in removing obstacles from this contractual scenario to fully include disabled people in society.

 Since the last century, a number of unprecedented demographic changes in human history have become evident. Likewise, the increase in life expectancy at birth along with extended active working life, a higher proportion of women in this age group, and a decrease in the number of children as evidenced in the low total fertility rate translate into changes that will inevitably bring about consequences to both humans and social structures.  On the basis of a broad scientific analysis, it could be said that extended, multi-generational families are still a source of solidarity. Indeed, the presence of grandparents provides certain stability as they contribute to family cohesion through their different and relevant contributions, support and care. Also, due to the gender gap in life expectancy , they will be even more challenging spaces for women.

This scientific paper analyzes how reasonable adjustments should be applied in a criminal procedure against defendants with cognitive intellectual disabilities in order to respect their right to due process.

Anualmente, los medios de prensa, reportan incendios forestales de gran magnitud en las regiones de la Amazonia, Chaco y Chiquitania de Bolivia, que afectan la vida de millones de plantas, animales nativos y poblaciones indígenas, entre otros. Por ello se propone indagar si resulta necesaria la intervención del poder punitivo, para prevenir y sancionar el ecocidio deliberado en nuestro ecosistema regional, causado por los incendios forestales provocados intencionalmente. La investigación realizada advierte que Bolivia, a nivel mundial, es el noveno país con concentración de bosques primarios y el cuarto con mayor pérdida en 2019, debido principalmente a la promulgación y puesta en vigencia de leyes y políticas administrativas que permiten la quema forestal para expandir la frontera agrícola y el agronegocio sin considerar su incidencia y grave afectación en el cambio climático, la biodiversidad, aire, agua, alimentación, vida de especies nativas, pueblos indígenas y habitantes de la Tierra; acciones que fueron calificadas por el Tribunal Internacional de los Derechos de la Naturaleza como delito de ecocidio a gran escala, determinando  la responsabilidad de la máximas autoridades bolivianas del poder ejecutivo, legislativo y judicial, entre otras.  El estudio, concluye que el ecocidio es una acción criminal que causa daños o destrucción masiva al sistema ecológico con grave afectación para la vida de los seres vivos, a la biodiversidad y ecosistemas. Existiendo vacío legal en el Código Penal boliviano resulta importante la tipificación del delito de ecocidio, acogiendo la normativa internacional inherente al tema, la normativa que protege los derechos de la madre Tierra, la legislación comparada y la jurisprudencia para tutelar los valores e intereses de raigambre constitucional como son: el derecho a la vida; a la salud y alimentación; al medio ambiente, saludable, protegido y equilibrado y a los derechos de los pueblos indígenas; así como los derechos de la Madre Tierra: a la vida,  al agua, a la diversidad de la vida, al aire limpio, al equilibrio y a vivir libre de contaminación.

A través del presente se realiza un comentario sobre el libro producido por el equipo de investigación que desarrolla sus tareas bajo la dirección de la Dra. Paola Alejandra Urbina en el marco de la carrera de Doctorado en Derecho de la Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales (UCES). Sus autores son: Mariela Alejandra Oziomek, María Pilar Delgado Peña, Blanca Nieves Rodríguez, Alejandra Mariel Lovat, Fernando Javier Mancuso, Noelia Giselle Irisarri González Deibe, Osvaldo Hugo Heguy, Ricardo Adrián Parra y Paula Camino.

In this study, we review the current panorama of social networks, both globally and nationally, to subsequently determine whether the large law firms in Spain are deciding to use them, whether they do so in a merely testimonial way or, if on the contrary, they do it in a professional way, and elucidate which are the social networks preferred by them. To do this, a sample of the most important law firms in Spain has been taken, taking into account both national and global billing criteria, analyzing which are the most used and the indicators that reveal whether or not they are making effective use of them. obtaining as a result that large law firms have definitely decided to use social networks in a professional way, although their preferences regarding the chosen social networks differ from the trend of the general public, both nationally and globally.