Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

Tourist activity generates an impact on the place visited, especially the environment, derived from the generation of solid waste, which is why the objective of this research is to diagnose the management of solid waste generated in the spa corridor of the magical town from Teapa, Tabasco, Mexico; The study was developed with a qualitative approach with a descriptive scope, on-site visits were applied and carried out, where the following dimensions were considered: generation, manipulation, collection, treatment and final disposal. The results show a deficiency in the management of solid waste, as well as little knowledge of the subject on the part of the participants, however, they show a willingness to participate in training and programs that guide them to transition to a sustainable culture, it is concluded that the Waste management is a collaborative effort between operators and government institutions for proper management.

This research proposes artisanal fishing as a tourist attraction in the parish of San Mateo de Manta. With a qualitative-quantitative approach with an exploratory-descriptive scope, based on a non-experimental design, surveys and interviews aimed at the tourism sector and academia were applied. It was concluded that tourists know about artisanal fishing, are interested in living the experience, are interested in learning about traditional fishing techniques, stories and related experiences and are willing to invest in artisanal fishing as a tourist activity. This has an impact on the improvement of the quality of life in the San Mateo parish by generating more alternatives for local sources of employment and promoting authentic and sustainable tourism.

Science teaching encourages the development of scientifically literate students, i.e. students who know how to use the scientific knowledge learned in the classroom to make sound decisions in everyday life. This influences researchers to seek a break with “traditional” methodologies and promote the use of tools/methodologies that can help develop scientific literacy, such as Didactic Sequences. Through a systemic analysis of the literature, this article aims to understand how the theories of teaching and learning defended by Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky and Paulo Freire are references in the construction of Didactic Sequences aimed at promoting Scientific Literacy. The data collected shows that the Didactic Sequence is based on the theories of Piaget, Vygotsky and Freire.

Gamification is a process that has been the subject of debate in the 21st century. A particularly delicate topic is the erroneous concepts related to ludic, games, and gamification. Despite having a single “gen”, it is possible to separate them, mainly thinking about the objectives and their application in education, for example. Considering that, this essay seeks to clarify the conceptual limits of gamification and its relation with the ludic and the game, exploring concepts and approaches. In this way, we expect to contribute to combating the dubious vision of gamification. Thus, without relegating other investigations, we assure that the objective of the ludic is to entertain (play), the game is to compete and the gamification is to involve through a process that uses game elements other than in games.

The latent possibility of a future regulation of euthanasia in Mexico makes ne-cessary to study different regulatory experiences existing in other latitudes. The criminalization of euthanasia in our country constitutes a clear limit to the functionalism as a method for carrying out a functional comparative study in this field. Therefore, this article is a study of foreign law which aims to provide a contextualized and in-depth analysis of the more than twenty years of ethical, medical and legal practice concerning the regulation of euthanasia in Belgium. In addition to a reasoned description of the Belgian Euthanasia Bill of 2002, a comprehensive explanation of the reasons behind the regulatory provisions will be offered. Different details about the practice will be addressed in order to generate a better understanding of the evolution of euthanasia in Belgium. The objective is to contribute to a future judicial or legislative debate in Mexico by analyzing important issues that have been raised during these last 22 years of euthanasia experience.

Obstetric violence is a practice recognized as a violation of human rights by international documents and organizations. According to the due diligence standard, applied by the Inter-American Human Rights System, states must make available a variety of resources and preventive measures that addresses the structural causes of violence against women. The case of Brítez Arce et al. v. Argentina shed a light on this women’s right violation and the need for states to act with due diligence on the structural causes that keep those practices in force. Therefore, with this study we aim to understand how this case strengthens state’s obligation to provide due diligence and what are the possible gaps in the decision. The authors draw on bibliographic research utilizing intersectionality as a theoretical framework and conclude that, although that decision is important as a leading case in OV, it presents some gaps. Those gaps are the lack of analysis in depth of social markers at play and their repercussions for women’s reproductive rights and social justice, the absence of a mandatory determination for adequate training of health professionals with a gender perspective, the need to promote Public Policy and facilitated access to justice for vulnerable communities.

El paradigma de los diálogos constitucionales surgió como un intento de superar la dualidad “Parlamento versus Cortes”, que ha dominado el pensamiento jurídico de las últimas décadas, en crítica a la idea de una palabra final y de supremacía judicial. Sin embargo, se observa que los estudios en esta temática se han centrado en debates teóricos, sin analizar los mecanismos que concretamente permiten el ejercicio de los diálogos constitucionales entre cortes, parlamentos y sociedad civil. El presente trabajo busca analizar los mecanismos que permiten el diálogo entre cortes constitucionales y sociedad civil de manera comparada, en un cotejo entre dos cortes con perfiles diversos de ejercicio de la jurisdicción: el Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil, y el Conseil Constitutionnel de Francia. Para ello, el trabajo se enfoca en las audiencias públicas, la participación de amici curiae y terceros interesados, desde un punto de vista normativo y jurisprudencial.

The purpose of this paper is to raise the need to implement a disability approach in human rights. For these purposes, we start from the human rights approach in social and development policies and analyze a public policy in the district of Tandil, province of Buenos Aires, Argentine Republic. This papel analyze the international corpus iuris on disability, the human rights approach as a prism for analyzing public policies and its projection in a local ordinance. The importance of establishing public policies on disability in municipal governments is evident. The novelty of these approaches and their recent incorporation into the local agenda are noted. It seeks to provide insight into the need to establish public policies with disability approaches. The originality is seen in the little development that exists on the disability approach in public policies and the recent incorporations to local agendas. It was concluded about the need to begin applying an approach to the rights of people with disabilities as a dismemberment of the rights approach. The public policy analyzed allowed us to see the importance that they have in our rights to be able to build a path towards true real equality of opportunities.

The rise of religious activism once again opens the discussion on the scope of secularism; therefore, this text aims to map the tensions around secularism(s) in order to present its main arguments and the way in which these are reorganized in the institutional and social field, based on the Brazilian, Colombian and Mexican cases, recovering some practices during the main electoral environments in the period 2016-2024. Through theoretical survey and comparative analysis, the way in which the variations of the problem itself challenge the debate on the contemporary religious phenomenon is presented, considering its specificities in the historical-social constructions of secularism. Which demonstrates the elasticity of the concept in its practice, beyond the abstract and normative framing that has been given to secular principles.

This paper proposes the conceptual and epistemic foundations for the development of a General Code of Procedure in Mexico, with special emphasis on evidentiary rules. The proposal is framed within applied legal epistemology, a discipline that examines the reliability of procedures aimed at determining the truth in law and relies on Enrique Cáceres’s complex legal constructivism as a theoretical framework that integrates cognitive sciences, complex systems theory, and philosophy of law. The study was conducted through a comparative law exercise based on the General Theory of Legislative Epistemic Competence (Tegecel), a theoretical and methodological tool that makes it possible to identify and measure the extent to which procedural rules promote or hinder the determination of truth. For this purpose, the general codes of procedure of Uruguay and Colombia were analyzed in order to identify the epistemic virtues of their evidentiary rules that could be adapted to the Mexican context. In conclusion, the article outlines guidelines for a law of evidence that balances epistemic and non-epistemic values, so that judicial decisions may be not only legally valid but also epistemically justified.