Sistema Regional de Información
en línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal

The development of autonomy in preschool children is fundamental for their daily development, especially in the case of children with Down syndrome, where it acquires even greater importance. The purpose of this research was to determine the level of perception of autonomy in 3-year-old children with Down syndrome in Callao - 2024 and to propose an intervention program for teachers. A basic quantitative methodology was used, with the participation of children from a state school in the region. The results revealed that autonomy has played a significant role, both in the children's ability to fend for themselves and in the structuring of knowledge. It was concluded that it is pertinent to formulate a proposal based on activities and training to strengthen and update teaching practice, with emphasis on pedagogical strategies aimed at children with Down syndrome.

The study reported in this article investigated the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in research processes within the fields of Physics-Mathematics and Mathematics. Data were collected from 78 students through questionnaires, revealing that both groups make extensive use of AI. The research found that researchers in Physics-Mathematics and Mathematics are employing artificial intelligence tools, such as machine learning and natural language processing, to analyze data, model phenomena and generate predictions, which is improving the efficiency and accuracy of their research processes. The study found no significant differences between the Physics-Mathematics and Mathematics fields in terms of the use of artificial intelligence in their research processes; Mathematics students apply it mainly in writing and solving mathematical problems, while Physics-Mathematics students use it in modeling physical systems and simulating experiments. These findings highlight the importance of AI in both careers and suggest the need for its inclusion in the curriculum to improve the training of students in these fields.

   

This article examines the critical importance of specialized legal defense within the realms of family and international law in Mexico, specifically focusing on the protection of the rights of girls, boys, and adolescents, as mandated by Article 666 of the National Code of Civil and Family Procedures. In the face of escalating cases of international child abduction and the inherent complexities of restitution and adoption procedures involving foreigners or Mexican residents abroad, this study underscores the pressing need for mandatory legal specialization aligned with international treaties and national legislation. Employing a qualitative approach, the research is grounded in normative and doctrinal analysis, review of international treaties, and consultation of doctrinal and jurisprudential sources, addressing the legal gaps and interpretative challenges present in current legislation. Findings reveal a lack of specificity in the Code regarding applicable treaties and procedural steps, highlighting the urgency of training highly specialized legal professionals in these areas. The conclusion emphasizes that such specialization, supported by academic institutions like the amedip, is indispensable for ensuring the effective protection of girls, boys, and adolescents rights in cross-border situations, thus promoting legal coherence and justice in international family matters.

Literature regarding the role of victims' public defenders in the criminal procedure concludes that, in most cases, they represent them passively in hearings. At the same time, it is observed that the justice system maintains an institutional asymmetry in detriment of the commissions of assistance to victims or similar. Nonetheless, these studies are based on a normative perspective, interested more in describing how victims' public defenders should behave rather than in understanding how they actually do. This article presents a qualitative case study of victims' public defenders in the state of Morelos. The framework of bounded rationality is used to argue that their performance is neither fully optimal nor based entirely on legal doctrine, but is influenced by internal and external factors. Specifically, institutional asymmetry is analyzed as an external factor affecting their intervention in hearings. Non-participant observation of hearings and semi-structured interviews are used. It is concluded that legal advisors have had to develop hearing intervention practices to deal with some consequences of institutional asymmetry, which, however, could undermine the minimum adequate protection of victims' rights.

In civil proceedings, a series of procedural burdens are imposed on the parties involved in the procedural legal relationship, so that each of them has the power to act and exercise the procedural rights that they possess. Thus, the defendant must file the answer to the claim within the term granted for such purpose in the summons to the trial. Now, the failure of the defendant to file an answer within the terms of the law generates the figure of default or contumacy which, in turn, produces a series of consequences of a procedural nature that are addressed in this work through the comparative study of different procedural codes of various federal states, the federal legislation, and the text of the recently published National Code, and the text of the recently published National Code of Civil and Family Procedures to identify the effects, as well as the similarities and differences between them, in addition to a doctrinal analysis of this legal figure that goes from the general to the particular, which, as a whole, allows to sustain the need to modify the normative text, even before its application.

This article analyzes the First Rapid Response Labor Panel in San Martin Mine, USA v. Mexico, the only one of its kind, under the Treaty between Mexico, the United States, and Canada. Although it ruled that it did not have jurisdiction, exceeding its powers, entered the study of the merits of the dispute, and set forth its opinions and conclusions in its Report or award which, although not legally valid, could erroneously be used by another Panel against the same San Martin Mine or any other alleged Covered facility in Mexico. Likewise, good faith in invocating the Labor Panel is also discussed. Finally, by way of example, some cases of arbitral tribunals that improperly support their determinations in decisions of other tribunals that do not have jurisdiction, such as Mondev v. USA, Loewen v. USA and Lion v. Mexico, are studied. The conclusion reached is that this approach’s consequences surprise, hinder, and distort the correctness of arbitral justice.

This article examines Mexican regulation of pesticide dusting by means of unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as areas of opportunity and potential impact from a legal perspective. As part of the research, some of the drones used in the agricultural sector and their characteristics are discussed. Regulations on the use of drones and pesticide dusting are also analyzed. The results show that the lack of regulation may lead to legal liability. At the same time, certain issues arising from this lack of regulation were identified. The study was constrained by the fact that regulations on the use of drones fall under aeronautical rather than environmental concerns. Moreover, the Official Mexican Standard leaves room for an ambiguous interpretation of liability. The originality of this paper lies in its intent to demonstrate that, regardless of drone regulation, it fails to consider the environmental issues of pesticide dusting. For this reason, comprehensive regulation among the various competent authorities concerned is required. In conclusion, legislation concerning the use of agricultural drones requires a comprehensive approach, making it possible to better safeguard people’s rights.

A very common phenomenon in countries subject to heavy immigration and one that is starting to become quite important in Spain, which has gone from being a country of emigration abroad to a country that receives citizens who come from other countries to live here, is the problem of so-called “marriages of convenience”. Through this type of marriage, the real aim is not to contract a marriage or to assume the rights and obligations that derive from marriage, but rather to obtain certain “benefits” in terms of nationality and foreigners (rapid and privileged acquisition of spanish nationality, obtaining a residence permit in Spain, family reunification, etc.). Consequently, these “marriages” are a form of fraud against the rules on Aliens and Nationality. For this reason, this paper attempts to specify, from the perspective of the most recent Spanish registry doctrine and case law, what is understood by marriage of convenience, to examine the indications of all marriages of convenience, the effects of these marriages and, finally, the possible ways of combating them. Through the study of their most characteristic features and elements..., their main purposes, as well as their signs of existence, their consequences, and, finally...

Electoral institutions in Mexico have undergone a tumultuous journey throughout their history, reflecting the constant struggle for democracy and electoral justice in the country. This article analyses the development of these institutions from the 19th century to the 21st-century reforms. The objective of the article is to analyze the evolution of electoral institutions in Mexico, identifying significant changes and current challenges. Using a legal history methodology, it examines relevant norms, laws, and decrees, considering each era’s political and social contexts. The results highlight significant transformations in the design and functions of electoral institutions and persistent challenges, such as the influence of organized crime and inequality in political participation. The conclusion emphasizes the need for ongoing reforms to strengthen the integrity and legitimacy of electoral processes in Mexico.